* segment sizes marked with an asterisk are estimates pending a measured run
Estimated per-node footprint, weights + KV sharded across the Spark (tensor parallel). Overhead ~8 GB/node; KV at FP16.
one MoE layer · 896 experts, 16+2 fire per token · showing 256
each expert ≈ 33M params
resident: 92 MoE layers × 896 experts × 33M ≈ 2696.1B
active/token: 92 × 16 × 33M ≈ 48.6B experts
+ 83.4B always-on dense (attention, embeddings, shared stack) = 132.0B active
Optimize
2779B params, ~1390 GB at already compressed-tensors-quantized and still ~1390 GB at 4-bit — one Spark can't hold it; you need surgery or more Sparks.
Make it fit
Get the weights (and headroom for KV) inside the 128 GB pool — the hard gate.
Prune experts (then quantize)
With 896 routed experts and only 16 firing per token, REAP-style pruning cuts total params without touching active compute (params include vision/audio towers).
pruning to half the experts ≈ halves the routed-expert weights, ~764 GB at 4-bit
Split or stream it
Even 4-bit is ~1390 GB against a 110 GB usable budget; shard across ≥13 Sparks or stream cold weights from NVMe.
Go below 4 bits
Codebook/outlier methods reach 2–3 bpw when 4-bit still overflows. — for MoE, the proven shape is a 2-bit sign-symmetric codebook on the routed experts with the dense stack kept at FP8 (vLLM-Moet).
~757 GB with 2-bit experts + FP8 dense (est.)
Make it fast
Once it fits: fewer bytes per token and fewer decode steps against 273 GB/s.
Add a speculative decoder
Decode is bandwidth-bound at ~4.1 tok/s ceiling; a trained EAGLE-style draft multiplies tokens per weight-read.
Tame the KV cache
At 1048576 tokens the KV cache alone is ~29 GB at FP16; quantize or evict.
Make it yours
Change what the model does — adapt, edit, or steer it — independent of size.
Fine-tune it
LoRA/QLoRA adapts behavior on one Spark without touching the base weights.
Edit or steer it
One-shot weight math — no gradients, no corpus.